OTLA 2026Sunriver ResortAugust 13 to 15

Pretty good isn't good
enough for legal work.

Every finding your demand relies on, traced to the exact page of the record. Nothing exports without your approval.

DEMAND LETTER
John Doe v N Valley Med Ctr
1Prerequisites
2Intake & records
3Generating
4Demand edit
5Review & export
Intake and records · Gate 1
12Files received
3,140Total pages
9Providers
3Treatment, no bill
Before you continue 1 high severity record integrity issue 3 providers with treatment and no billing
Approve and continue →
Generating from the verified record
Record intake assessment
Verified chronology and injury diagnosis
Legal merit analysis
Demand assembly
Injuries and treatment · paragraph 4 of 11
On 21 May 2024, John Doe sustained a displaced left bimalleolar ankle fracture requiring open reduction and internal fixationVeriSource™. Fixation was confirmed intraoperatively and documented in the operative report.
VeriSource™
NorthValley_Operative_JohnDoe_FINAL.pdf · Page 3 · Bates NVMC 000412
Open reduction and internal fixation, left bimalleolar ankle fracture. Fixation confirmed intraoperatively.
Every paragraph approved before export
HIPAA Compliant SOC 2 Type I and II Certified Built by clinicians and expert witnesses Surfaces what the other side will find Nothing exports without your approval
What's at stake

Your name goes on the demand.
Not the software's.

One missing record. One unsupported sentence. One number you cannot trace. That is all it takes to hand the other side an opening.

It gets worse than that. The record has it. The tool says it doesn't.

  1. 01

    A demand the adjuster discounts.

  2. 02

    A number you cannot back up.

  3. 03

    A case you shouldn't have taken.

Once one finding doesn't hold, the rest of your work gets read differently.

How it works

Three steps. You approve every one.

01

Take the right cases

Record Integrity scores what the provider actually sent, and names what to go back and request.

Including the ED visit only the chiropractor mentions.

RECORD INTEGRITYJohn Doe v N Valley Med Ctr
72Completeness score
Fair
High
Emergency department records referenced but not present
Chiropractic note dated 14 Aug references an ED visit at N Valley on 21 May. No ED record appears in the uploaded set.
Remediation. Request ED records from N Valley Med Ctr for 21 May 2024.
VeriSource™ · Chiro_Progress_Notes.pdf · Page 118 · Bates NVMC 001183
02

Build the full demand

Damages drawn from the billed amounts in the record, reconciled against the chronology. The demand is only as big as the bills you found.

Where the record is silent, we say so.

INTAKE AND RECORDSGate 1
9Providers detected
6Billing on file
3Treatment, no bill
Economic damages overview
John Doe v N Valley Med Ctr · drawn from the billing in the record
North Valley Health System, inpatient and surgicalPage 3$62,418.00
Outpatient physical therapy, 14 visitsPage 41$4,760.00
Emergency department evaluationPage 12Amounts not stated
Non-economic damagesUnquantified
VerixAi organizes and cites the damages evidence in the record. It does not total the case or assign a settlement value. That stays with you.
03

Prove every finding

Every citation opens the source document at the exact page, with the passage shown and the Bates reference where the record carries one.

Click it. See its page.

SOURCE DOCUMENTPage 3 of 6
NorthValley_Operative_JohnDoe_FINAL.pdf
Open reduction and internal fixation, left bimalleolar ankle fracture. Fixation confirmed intraoperatively.
Bates NVMC 000412
Before the other side does

See the flaws in the case the other side may never notice.

Record Integrity and Gap Analysis roll up into litigation terms. Risk level, category, and the page it came from.

Causation, inconsistency, and what the record never says

Every finding carries a risk level and a category tag, and expands to its impact on causation and the reasoning behind it.

VerixAi flags where the question sits. Your expert determines the answer.

VULNERABILITIESJohn Doe v N Valley Med Ctr
5High Risk
5Medium Risk
0Low Risk
High
Treatment referenced. Records never produced.
A referral appears in the chart with no corresponding encounter anywhere in the uploaded set.
Causation Ambiguity · VeriSource™ · Page 28
High
Prior injury to the same region in the record
Documented before the date of loss. The adjuster will find it.
Internal Inconsistency · VeriSource™ · Page 63
The difference

Not all AI is the same.

Three tools solving three different problems. Only one of them was built by clinicians for the medical record.

General-use AI

Broad tools for everyday work. Can't digest a 40,000-page record.

Other specialty legal AI

Firm workflows and general legal work. Not built for medical-record depth.

VerixAi

Clinician-built for the medical record. Every finding cited to its page.

Think another platform compares? Run the same case through both. Contact us to get started.
Who built it

A note from the clinicians and expert witnesses behind VerixAi.

We spent our careers in medicine and on the witness stand. We have both been the one asked to back up a finding, live, with the other side waiting.

So we built the platform we would trust our own names to. Gaps stated, not papered over.

We did not build VerixAi to replace your judgment. We built it so your judgment has the record behind it, every time.

Saurabh Gupta, MD
Saurabh Gupta, MD
Founder, CorMetrix. Interventional cardiologist and retained expert witness.
Oregon

Our founder practices
twenty minutes from here.

CorMetrix was founded in Oregon. Saurabh Gupta was on faculty at OHSU and practices cardiology in Bend, just up the road.

At the conference

Bring your hardest case.

You walk into the negotiation knowing the record better than the adjuster reading it.

A 20-minute working demonstration on a complex synthetic case. We follow a real finding back to the exact source page, live, and you decide whether it holds up. No slides unless you ask for them.

Find us at OTLA
August 13 to 15
Sunriver Resort, Bend
Exhibitor hall, open all three days
Look for the VerixAi booth